This section of the user manual provides the specialist user with information required to establish and manage this subsystem. General use of this subsystem requires that relevant reference data and components of existing systems (configured appropriately for use in the Research subsystem) exist, before the subsystem can be used. Knowledge of the information in the introduction to the Research Subsystem is assumed.
In this Section:
Establishing and Maintaining Reference Data.
Configuring Research Calendars and Date Aliases.
Establishing Admission and Enrolment Processes.
Course Types.
Attendance Types.
See Also:
Special Topics.
Calculation of EFTD Used/Total and Submission Dates for a Candidature.
EFTSU Calculation for Research Units.
Valid Candidature Attendance Percentage Ranges.
Reference data is input and maintained through the forms listed below. This data is subsystem-wide reference information and must be available before the subsystem can be used. These forms would be used by a specialist user, who has responsibility for maintaining the Research subsystem.
The data established using the following forms allows institution-defined terminology to be used. In some cases (highlighted * in the lists below), these require linking to system-defined statuses or types. Refer to the relevant form documentation for detailed explanation, but note that if the data is not established and related to system values correctly, system functionality is affected.
In creating some reference data, access to other reference data is required. Milestone Types must be established before Course Default Milestones are set up. Tracking Types (linked to the system tracking types RES_TEX and RES_TPM) should be created before the Thesis Panel Types or Thesis Panel Member Types are established, if a Tracking Type is to be defined as an attribute of a Thesis Panel or Thesis Panel Member Type.
Maintain Scholarship Types RESF31A0
Maintain Supervisor Types RESF3122
Maintain Milestone Types RESF3110
*Maintain Milestone Statuses RESF31F0
Maintain Course Default Milestones RESF3231
*Maintain Thesis Result Codes RESF31B0
Maintain Thesis Panel Types RESF3181
Maintain Thesis Examination Types RESF3183
Maintain Thesis Panel Member Types RESF3184
*Maintain Tracking Types TRKF1100
Institution-defined tracking types and their associated steps are set up using this form. Two system tracking types are defined for the research subsystem.. Each system tracking type has a set of associated System Step Types, which can be used when defining steps for this Tracking Type.
System Tracking Type |
System Step Type |
Default Recipient |
RES_TEX |
RES_TEX_CH |
Chair of Thesis Panel |
|
RES_TEX_OR |
Originator of Tracking Item |
|
RES_TEX_PR |
Principal Supervisor |
|
RES_TEX_ST |
Candidate (student) |
RES_TPM |
RES_TPM_OR |
Originator of Tracking Item |
|
RES_TPM_PE |
Examiner. |
Tracking types for use in tracking the Thesis Examination must be defined as the system type 'RES_TEX'; tracking types for tracking the Thesis Panel Member must be defined as the system type 'RES_TPM'.
The System Step Types can be used when defining the Tracking Type Steps, where the default recipient is the appropriate recipient for that step. A System Step Type does not have to be allocated to each Tracking Type Step.
When Tracking Items are created for a particular thesis examination or panel member (refer to Understanding Research), the steps which have linked System Step Types will have the default recipient inserted.
Example: A tracking item is created for Student ID 98722771 (J. Gambetti) which includes (among others) the following steps. For this candidate the Principal Supervisor is Prof. M.Drake; Chair of the Thesis Panel is Dr. A. James; the research staff member who originated the Tracking Item is J.Kelley.
Tracking Item Steps: |
System Step Type |
Default Recipient |
Recipient Name |
Contact Principal Supervisor |
RES_TEX_PR |
Principal Supervisor |
Prof. M.Drake |
Contact Chair of Examining Panel |
RES_TEX_CH |
Chair of Thesis Panel |
Dr. A. James |
Receipt of Nominated Examiners |
RES_TEX_OR |
Originator of Tracking Item |
J.Kelley |
Notify Student of Outcomes |
RES_TEX_ST |
Candidate (student) |
J. Gambetti |
(For a general understanding of the Tracking subsystem, refer to Tracking,.)
These codes allow the reporting of information to government, relating to the studies of research students. There are 3 sets of government codes used for this purpose. They are the Type of Activity Classification Codes (TOA); the Fields of Study (FOS) and the Socio-Economic Objective Classifications (SEO). It is recommended that institution-defined codes for Fields of Study and Socio-Economic Objective Classifications have a 1:1 mapping to the relevant Government code.
The use of the Government FOS and SEO codes is in transition (at the time of development of the Research subsystem) from Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DEST) codes to Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) codes. Callista provides the ability to use either.
Because of this transition, existing Government Fields of Study codes (STAF1123) may need to be updated, using the relevant form. These codes now require an indicator to be set where the code is an ABS Research Fields, Courses and Disciplines Classification (RFCD).
Maintain Government Type of Activity Classification Codes RESF31E0
Maintain Government Socio-Economic Objective Classifications RESF31C0
Maintain Socio-Economic Objective Classification RESF31D0
Maintain Government Fields of Study STAF1123
Maintain Fields of Study CRSF1140
Particular calendars, date aliases and calendar relationships need to be established for the correct functioning of the Research subsystem. This should be done by specialists with understanding of both the Calendar and Research subsystems.
Research studies commonly do not fit the standard teaching periods (e.g. semesters). They may span the full 365 days of a calendar year and require date-to-date enrolment. Therefore teaching calendars and date aliases more appropriate for research must be created.
A research student is usually able to start and stop their research without the penalties that generally apply to coursework students. Consequently appropriate administrative unit statuses and unit discontinuation date aliases allowing withdrawal (without a grading penalty) must be created. (Grading schema for use in Research should exist).
Accurate load and EFTSU calculations require the correct configuration of load calendar structures for research and relationships between load and research teaching calendars. EFTSU calculations also require accurate maintenance of a candidate's attendance, over the period of their research (refer to EFTSU in Special Topics; also RESF3211 for explanation about maintaining a candidate's attendance details).
respic1.gif
Teaching Calendar Instance |
'RES-STRT' - the Effective Start Date Alias |
'RES-END' - the Effective End Date Alias |
RES-2: 01/07/1998-31/12/1998 |
19/07/1998 |
05/12/1998 |
SUM: 30/11/1998-28/02/1999 |
06/12/1998 |
28/02/1999 |
RES-1:01/01/1999-30/06/1999 |
01/03/1999 |
18/07/1999 |
RES-2: 01/07/1999-31/12/1999 |
19/07/1999 |
05/12/1999 |
SUM: 30/11/1999-29/02/2000 |
06/12/1999 |
29/02/2000 |
RES-1: 01/01/2000-30/06/2000 |
01/03/2000 |
18/07/2000 |
RES-2: 01/07/2000-31/12/2000 |
19/07/2000 |
05/12/2000 |
Note: It may be appropriate to offset the research start date alias instances from the admission calendar course start date alias instances. For the RES-1 (01/01/1999 - 30/06/1999) calendar in the example above, 'RES-STRT' could be offset from the course start date alias for the subordinate admission period calendar instance by 0 days.
The correct configuring of these required elements can be done by following the steps outlined here:
Example:
Administrative Unit Status |
Description |
'WDN' |
Withdrawn from Research |
'WDN PC' |
Withdrawn from Research after the Census date |
Teaching Period: RES-1 01/01/2000 - 30/06/2000
Administrative Unit Status |
Date Alias |
Date Alias Value |
Load Incurred? |
Grading Schema Grade |
'WDN' |
WDN-RES |
31/03/2000 |
N |
W-withdrawn |
'WDN PC' |
WDN-RES-PC |
01/04/2000 |
Y |
W-withdrawn |
Teaching Period RES-2 01/07/2000 - 31/12/2000
'WDN' |
WDN-RES |
31/08/2000 |
N |
W-withdrawn |
'WDN PC' |
WDN-RES-PC |
01/09/2000 |
Y |
W-withdrawn |
An Example Load Apportionment (using the example configuration)
Load Calendar Instance |
Default Load Apportion |
|
|
Teaching Period |
Percentage |
LOAD-CAL-1 |
RES-1 |
100 |
LOAD-CAL-2 |
RES-2 |
100 |
LOAD-CAL-3 |
SUM |
100 |
The Load Research % value should also be set for applicable load calendars, to ensure correct EFTSU calculation. These relationships and values are established using form CALF0330. The Load Research % is allocated to the appropriate load calendars, in the Subordinate Calendars block (scroll across the spread table to display this field). This Load Research % must total 100% within an academic period.
An Example Load Research % Allocation (using the example configuration)
Teaching Period |
Load Calendar |
Load Research % |
RES-1 |
LOAD-CAL-1 |
50% |
RES-2 |
LOAD-CAL-2 |
50% |
SUM |
LOAD-CAL-3 |
NULL |
In the standard Australian configuration, research load is equally divided between the two Census dates (31st March and 31st August), so the two load calendars which span these census dates have the Load Research % divided between them. Load Research % should not be allocated to any other load calendar (there should be a null value rather than a 0 value). For students who need to be enrolled in research units in teaching periods which contribute to other load calendars (e.g. the teaching period 'SUM' contributing to 'LOAD-CAL-3'), EFTSU is calculated using the standard method (where the number of override or enrolled credit points is divided by the standard annual load value explained in EFTSU calculation for Statistics).
Using the example Load Research % allocation above, a student enrolled in a research unit in the 'SUM' teaching period (because her research commencement date was prior to 1st March, the course start date alias instance for the admission calendar instance subordinate to RES-1) would generate EFTSU calculated in the standard way for LOAD-CAL-3, and where her enrolment continued into RES-1, would generate EFTSU calculated using the Research EFTSU calculation method, for LOAD-CAL-1.
A specialist in the Admissions subsystem should establish an Admissions Process Category (containing the 'RESEARCH' Admission Step Type) for use in the admission of Research students. The inclusion of a 'RESEARCH' Admission Step allows the display of the Candidature navigation button on the Direct Admissions form (ADMF3000). An applicant for a research course ( one where the Course Type has the Research indicator set), cannot be made an offer/conditional offer unless certain components of a candidature record exist (submission dates, research topic and principal supervisor). For these admission applications, navigation to the Research Candidature Details form (RESF3211) must be available from ADMF3000.
Defining the 'RESEARCH' step as a mandatory step applies the same requirements for any application made under this admission process category (i.e. before an offer/conditional offer can be made, submission dates, research topic and principal supervisor must exist in the candidature record).
The creation of Admission Process Categories is explained further in the following documentation:
Admissions Overview; the form documentation Maintain Admission Category - ADMF2M20 and Maintain Admission Process Category Details - ADMF2M30
An Enrolment Category containing the Enrolment Procedure Step of 'RESEARCH' must be established, to allow display of the Candidature button on the Record Enrolments form (ENRF3000). The candidature fields (listed above) must exist before a Student Course Attempt (in a research course) can be confirmed. Where this data is not brought forward from an admission application or needs to be maintained at enrolment, access to RESF3211 is required in ENRF3000.
The creation of an Enrolment Category would usually be done by an Enrolments specialist. Further information is available in the following documentation:
Enrolments Subsystem Overview and the form Maintain Enrolment Category Procedure Detail - ENRF0192
Course structures would be established by a specialist in the Course Structure and Planning subsystem. Certain aspects are noted here because of their implications for the Research subsystem.
Each course offered by an institution has a Course Type attribute. Course Types (and their associated Research Indicator) are maintained in the form Maintain Course Types CRSF1110. The setting of the Research Indicator does not determine whether the course is classified as a research course for government reporting purposes. However, the Research indicator should be selected for those course types where the institution requires that on admission/enrolment, a candidature record must be created.
An applicant for admission to a course which has this Research Indicator set, cannot be offered a place (i.e. have their Admission Outcome Status set to 'OFFER' or 'COND-OFFER') without an existing Candidature and its mandatory fields (see RESF3211). Where a Student Course Attempt is not created through the pre-enrolment process (from Admissions), the same restriction applies and the SCA cannot be confirmed without mandatory candidature details.
A Course Offering Option has an Attendance Type as one of its attributes (see CRSF1400). The Attendance Types defined by an institution are maintained in the form Maintain Attendance Types CRSF1170. Each Attendance Type should have a Research Percentage value defined, as one of the attributes of the type.
Example:
Attendance Type |
Research Percentage |
Full Time |
100 |
Part Time |
50 |
The default Attendance Percentage for a Candidature (see RESF3211) is derived from the Attendance Type Research Percentage value.
The research courses offered by an institution (see Course Type and Research Indicators above) must have a Min Submission Perc attribute value entered. This represents the minimum percentage of effective research days which must be completed before a thesis can be submitted. This field is defined using the form Maintain Basic Course Details CRSF1210.
Example:
Course |
Course Type |
EFTSU |
Std FT Compltn |
Min Submission Perc |
Earliest Submission (in EFTD) |
Doctor of Science |
Higher Doctorate |
3.000 |
30 |
50 |
547.5 |
PhD (Science) |
Doctorate by Research |
2.000 |
20 |
50 |
365.0 |
Master of Science |
Master's by Research |
1.000 |
10 |
50 |
182.5 |
The Min Submission Perc value is used in the system calculation of a candidate's Min Submission Date (refer to Special Topics and RESF3211).
The Research subsystem requires the establishment of unique research units, designed for students undertaking either a research-only course or a course which combines a research unit with some coursework units. The EFTSU for a research candidate enrolled in one of these research units (in a research teaching period) is derived using a different method than would be used for a non-research unit. This calculation method is explained in detail in the Special Topics section of this documentation.
The other important consequence of enrolment in a research unit is that teaching responsibility (and therefore income distribution to organisational units within the institution) is derived from the candidate's supervision arrangements. For this reason it is suggested that both ownership (in form CRSF2210) and teaching responsibility (in form CRSF2220) be allocated to a non-academic organisational unit, such as the Research Office, when unit details are entered.
It is suggested that a research unit be established for each discipline and research level offered by an institution.
Example: An institution offers research studies at four levels - Higher Doctorate, PhD, Masters or Honours. For each discipline group offered at the institution, four research units are created, one at each research level. The unit codes indicate the research level (2 alphabet characters e.g. PD) and the discipline group (4 digits taken from the discipline group classifications CRSF2110)
Unit Code |
Description |
HD0901 |
Higher Doctorate Research - Economics |
PD0901 |
PhD Research - Economics |
MR0901 |
Masters Research - Economics |
HN0901 |
Honours Research - Economics |
HD0405 |
Higher Doctorate Research - Chemical Sciences |
PD0405 |
PhD Research - Chemical Sciences |
MR0405 |
Masters Research - Chemical Sciences |
HN0405 |
Honours Research - Chemical Sciences |
The creation of these units and their associated detail is done through the Basic Unit Details form CRSF2210. Particular consideration should be given to certain attributes of the research units established.
The Research indicator: this must be set for the unit to be classified as a research unit.
The Repeatable indicator: setting this indicator means the credit points associated with the unit (Achievable Credit Points) are attributed to the student's academic record each time the unit is passed. If the indicator is not set, the credit points are achievable once only, regardless of the number of times the unit is passed.
Enrolled Credit Points: the value entered for Enrolled Credit Points is used to calculate EFTSU where a student enrols in the unit in a non- research teaching period (i.e. one which does not calculate EFTSU using the research calculation method). An Enrolled Credit Points value must exist to ensure the inclusion of the unit enrolments in statistical reports to government. Where an institution intends configuring calendars in a similar way to the example configuration, with research units offered in a 'SUM' teaching period (which uses the standard EFTSU calculation) then an appropriate Enrolled Credit Points value should be entered.
Achievable Credit Points: this value is the number of credit points awarded to a student on successful completion of a unit. If it is blank, it is assumed to be the same as the Enrolled Credit Points. Where 0 is recorded, no credit points are awarded on completion. This may be appropriate where an institution decides credit points are not to be awarded for research units at the end of a semester; instead a 'Satisfactory Progress' grade is to be awarded.
Override Credit Points: this indicator and associated detail, allows the overriding of either the calculated research EFTSU or the enrolled/achievable credit points for a specified student unit attempt. For example a full-time research student is enrolled in the research unit MRO405 for the following teaching periods. For the student unit attempt in the 'SUM' teaching period, it may be appropriate to override the Credit Points and use a lower credit point value. The maximum EFTSU for this student is generated by the student unit attempts in the RES-1 and RES-2 periods.
Teaching Period |
Load Calendar |
Load Research % |
EFTSU calculation method |
RES-1 |
LOAD-CAL-1 |
50% |
uses Research calculation |
RES-2 |
LOAD-CAL-2 |
50% |
uses Research calculation |
SUM |
LOAD-CAL-3 |
NULL |
uses standard calculation |
Override Title indicator: setting this indicator allows the unit title to be overriden for a student unit attempt. For example a student is enrolled in the unit titled 'Honours Research - Chemical Science' as part of a coursework honours course. The title is overriden for this student unit attempt and becomes 'Honours Minor Thesis - Chemical Science'.
All research units should be offered in all research teaching periods. This allows a candidate's research to continue from one teaching period to the next, through re-enrolling in the research unit. The creation of appropriate Unit Offerings is done in form CRSF2310, accessed from CRSF2210.
The grading schema to be used for research units is assigned in the Unit Offering Options form (CRSF2500, accessed from CRSF2310).
The creation of research teaching calendars is explained in Configuring Research Calendars.
This process is explained fully in Managing Unit Discontinuation. The Research subsystem requires the creation of unit discontinuation date aliases and administrative unit statuses which allow withdrawal from research units without assessment penalty.
Refer to the section Configuring Research Calendars to understand how to establish unit discontinuation date aliases and appropriate administrative unit statuses for research units.
A research candidate, enrolled in a research unit is unlikely to complete their research and have their thesis examined in a single teaching period. For this reason, grading schema used in other areas of study may not provide the appropriate grades for use with research units. A grading schema appropriate for use in the research subsystem should be established. This would usually be established by an Assessment subsystem specialist, in consultation with Research specialists. Grading schema are maintained using form ASSF5110.
Example:
Grade |
Full Grade Name |
Result |
Explanation |
RC |
Research Continuing |
PASS |
This confers any credits points recorded in CRSF2210 as the number of 'Achievable Credit Points'. Setting the 'Repeatable' indicator to 'Y' means that credit is conferred each time the student enrols in and achieves a grade linked to the system result of type 'PASS'. (Note the setting of the Override Credit Points indicator provides a further layer of flexibility. |
UP |
Unsatisfactory Progress |
FAIL |
Typically awarded following a review of the candidate's research by a progress committee. Application of the grade may be accompanied by an encumbrance to constrain or limit further enrolment. |
W |
Withdrawn from Research |
WITHDRAWN |
Typically awarded where the candidate withdraws temporarily or permanently from the course. No academic penalty applies. |
RI |
Research Incomplete |
INCOMP |
A holding grade. No credit is awarded and it signifies that research is incomplete. Normally this grade would be converted to either RC or UP following review by the progress committee. |
Updated 31 January 2002