In this section:
NOTE: This section provides either summary information for quick reference, or supplementary information. In either case, a good understanding of the Student Finance subsystem is assumed.
Levels |
||||
Calculation and schedule data can be stored in the database at more than one level, with the level at which it is stored determining the scope of a fee. Different forms and screens act as different 'gateways', each of which allows the entry and access of data at one of the levels. | ||||
Calculation Example |
As a very simple example, consider a computer access fee with the fee type COMP-ACC. This fee has been assigned to two categories: INTRNTL-UG and DOMESTC-UG. Assume that this fee is to be charged at a flat rate of $75 in the FEE-SEM1 fee period. | |||
|
||||
|
||||
Schedules Example |
Schedules can potentially be set up at three levels. To use the payment schedule as an example of scheduling the COMP-ACC fee described above: | |||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
To extrapolate from these examples, for calculation and schedule data - | ||||
Data can apply to: | Use form: | Level abbreviation: | ||
All occurrences of a fee type, irrespective of category | FINF2100 | FTCI
level (Fee Type level) |
||
All fee types in a particular category (schedules only) |
FINF2800 (1st screen) |
FCCI
level (Fee Category level) |
||
A single fee type in a particular category | FINF2800 (2nd screen) | FCFL
level (Fee Liability level) |
||
The next section summarises which levels can be used for which data, and the override and other rules that apply. | ||||
|
||||
It is expected that this summary will be most useful once you are reasonably familiar with the forms used in setting up Student Finance data. |
FTCI level | FCCI level | FCFL level | ||
Schedules | See Schedules notes below | |||
Charge method | Charge method and rule must be at same level | |||
Charge method apportionment | ||||
Payment rank | ||||
Rule |
||||
Rate | See Calculation notes below | |||
Element ranges | See Element ranges notes below | |||
Define trigger type |
See Institution fee notes below |
|||
Use triggers |
Not applicable to INSTITUTN trigger category |
|||
Tax exempt indicator | HECS and INSTITUTN fees | |||
( ) | See Tax notes below | |||
Tax rule | See Tax notes below |
Key | For each row in the table: | |||
Fee data can exist at these levels simultaneously |
||||
Fee data can exist at either level, but not both |
Schedule Notes | ||||
For fees with a HECS system fee type or an INSTITUTN system fee trigger category, schedules must be at FTCI level. In these two cases, lack of a particular schedule at this level is taken to mean that the corresponding schedule conditions do not apply for these fees, even where they are included in a category with a schedule of the same kind at FCCI level. | ||||
Where a schedule exists at FTCI level, a corresponding schedule cannot be created at FCFL level, and vice versa. | ||||
Where a fee type has a schedule at FTCI level, this schedule overrides one at FCCI level for that fee type only. | ||||
A fee liability schedule at FCFL level overrides a schedule at FCCI level for the corresponding fee type only. | ||||
Calculation Notes | ||||
Fees with either a HECS system fee type or an INSTITUTN system fee trigger category must have calculation details defined at FTCI level. | ||||
Charge rate and element ranges must be specified at the same level. | ||||
As well as by level, rates can be further differentiated by:
|
||||
Element Ranges Notes | ||||
Element ranges cannot be specified for a fee if:
and can only be specified at the FTCI level for institution fees. |
||||
Institution Fee Notes | ||||
Fees with the an INSTITUTN system fee trigger category:
|
||||
Tax Notes | ||||
Fees are taxable unless the Tax Exempt indicator is set (checked). If a category (FCCI level) is set as tax exempt, all liabilities for the category (at FCFL level) must be tax exempt. But if a category is taxable, it can include component liabilities that are tax exempt. For fees with a system fee type of HECS or an INSTITUTN system fee trigger category, tax data is defined at FTCI level and cannot be overridden.
For other than HECS or institution fees:
|
||||
Rates |
||||
NOTE: The rates discussed here do not include contract rates established with individual students in the Maintain Contract Fee Assessment Rates form (FINF2900). They do include contracts based on standard rates and established through Admissions (ADMF3660). | ||||
Rates for fee types are set up in the Define Fee Assessment Rates form (FINF2853), which can be accessed either from the Maintain Fee Types form (FINF2100) or from the Maintain Fee Categories form (FINF2800). | ||||
At either of these levels, multiple rates can be specified for a single fee type. Rates may be defined on various attributes or criteria. | ||||
The criteria available for a fee type depends on its system fee type, as shown in the table below. Note that if the sets of criteria recorded for a particular fee's rates do not cover all the options, a fee is not incurred for the options not covered. For example, in a multi-campus institution, a rate may be defined only for Campus A and Campus B. Students studying at Campus C will not incur the fee. |
For fees with OTHER system fee types, select from these criteria: | ||||
|
||||
For fees with HECS system fee types, select from these criteria: | ||||
|
||||
For fees with TUITION system fee types, select from these criteria: | ||||
|
||||
Certain combinations of criteria are mutually exclusive - for example, the values 'full time' and 'part time' for two rates set up using only the attendance type as a criterion are mutually exclusive. But some combinations can be ambiguous, with the potential for different rates to apply in the assessment of a single student fee liability. In these circumstances, an Order of Precedence must be given to each criteria combination applied to a fee liability. | ||||
Using Order of Precedence | ||||
It may be desirable to have one rate covering the majority of courses studied at any location, and for any attendance type or mode, and then specify rates with particular criteria for a limited number of exceptions. For example, one rate is set for full-time students in course AA111 at Campus A, a second for on-campus students in course BB222, version 2 at Campus B, and a third for all other options. In this case, it is important to set up the exceptions to take precedence over the general case, and this would be achieved as follows: |
Order of Precedence |
Course Code |
Version Number |
Location Code |
Attendance Type |
Attendance Mode |
Rate |
1 |
AA111 |
- |
Campus A |
F/T |
- |
Rate X |
2 |
BB222 |
2 |
Campus B |
- |
N |
Rate Y |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Rate Z |
Where a criterion field is left blank in the Define Fee Assessment Rates form, FINF2853, this indicates that the rate applies for any value of that criterion. To ensure that unit assessment rates are applied over course rates, unit assessment rates must have a higher order of precedence than course rates. | |||
Government Classifications | |||
A government HECS payment option can be a single criterion, or may be used in conjunction with a government HECS contribution band. | |||
HECS fees, which have a government HECS payment option of 10, 11 or 12, are typically set up using 12 sets of criteria as shown below. This covers both rates for students not liable for differential HECS, as well as a rate per band for those students to whom differential HECS applies. |
Govt HECS Payment Option | |||
Govt
HECS Contribution Band
|
Sample
$ value of Charge Rate
|
||
10 - Deferred payment |
Rate A |
2520.00
|
|
1
|
Rate
B
|
3356.00
|
|
2
|
Rate C |
4779.00
|
|
3 |
Rate
D
|
5593.00
|
|
11 - Upfront payment with discount |
Rate
A
|
2520.00
|
|
1 |
Rate
B
|
3356.00 |
|
2
|
Rate
C
|
4779.00 |
|
3 |
Rate D |
5593.00 |
|
12 - Upfront payment - no discount |
Rate
A
|
2520.00 |
|
1 |
Rate B |
3356.00 |
|
2 |
Rate C |
4779.00 |
|
3 |
Rate D |
5593.00 |
A flag is set in ENRF0161 (Govt HECS Payment Options) to indicate that a payment option attracts the discount shown in the payment schedule form. |
|
Further information is given in the section on HECS Payment Options. |
Derived Versus Nominated Course Attributes |
|||
In the case of some enrolled students, the values recorded against their student course attempts for location, attendance type and attendance mode may be at variance with the values that would be returned by examining the composite effect of their individual unit enrolments for the course. For example, a student course attempt may have an off campus attendance mode recorded, but the student may be studying a majority of their units on campus. | |||
In the case of fee assessment, it is therefore important to understand whether nominated values (recorded against the course attempt) or derived values (arrived at through an examination of units studied) are being used in specific situations. | |||
Course fee triggers | |||
Course fee triggers can be created (in FINF2222) to match a course attempt on any or all of the three attributes location, attendance type and attendance mode. These triggers are matched to nominated course attempt attributes, and where a match is made, the student is liable for the fee thus triggered. | |||
Rates (including contract rates) | |||
Note that course, unit and cohort attributes for rates do not apply to HECS fees, which can be differentiated only by HECS payment options and contribution bands. | |||
System Fee Trigger Categories = other than INSTITUTN | |||
With a system fee trigger category of COURSE, UNIT, UNITSET, COMPOSITE the fee relates to a single course attempt. | |||
A rate with location specified is matched against the nominated location of the student course attempt. | |||
A rate with an attendance mode and/or attendance type specified is matched against a derived attendance type or mode. | |||
Derived values are determined in the following way: Attendance mode
Attendance type The derivation process considers only unit attempts in teaching periods related to the load calendar that is linked to the fee period. Where the load calendar is an aggregate load calendar, EFTSU is calculated for each of its subordinate load calendars and then summed.
|
|||
System Fee Trigger Category = INSTITUTN | |||
Where a student is enrolled in more than one course, an assessment for an institution-wide fee must take all course attempts liable for the fee into consideration when determining the rate. | |||
A rate with location specified is matched against the nominated location of the major course attempt. The major course attempt is regarded as that in which the sum of the unit EFTSU values for the student is the greatest, or, where course attempts have equal EFTSU value, the course that was commenced earliest. | |||
A rate with an attendance mode and/or attendance type specified is matched against a derived attendance type or mode. | |||
Derived values are decided by:
|
|||
Credit |
|||
A credit balance is held for a person or an organisation. It is based on all fees for which a student or sponsor has ever been liable, irrespective of fee periods, courses or (for sponsors) the number of students involved. | |||
For students, the Student Finance subsystem distinguishes between unmatched payments and system credit. | |||
Unmatched payments |
|||
This amount is the total of received payments that have not yet been matched to invoiced debt. Creation of invoices, receipt of payments and matching of payments to debt is handled by processes providing an interface between Callista and an external financial system. Payments are not recorded as payment transactions against specific fees within core Callista until this matching has been done. If the unmatched payments total is greater than the system credit, the difference is not available for refund. | |||
Unmatched payments can be seen in FINF9130. |
|||
System credit |
|||
System credit for a student is calculated in this way: |
|||
|
|||
Deferred HECS. A HECS debt is not subtracted if the student's HECS payment option is deferred as at the Census Date. | |||
Tax. Calculation of system credit includes tax debts and payments. | |||
System credit can be seen in FINF6420 (Maintain Refunds) and in FINF9130 (System Credit Inquiry). A student's system credit is available for refund. | |||
Notes on Processing System Credit | |||
The system credit is reduced to take account of a student's increased debt (reflecting an increase in study load) as soon as an assessment or reassessment is made in a fee period (that is, immediately after running FINJ3500 or FINJ3001). At this point, invoices have not been created for the newly assessed debt. | |||
For decreased debt (a reduction in study load in a given fee period), the system credit does not always show increased credit immediately a reassessment is run in the period.
|
|||
Credit implications | |||
Statement of Account | |||
Both system credit and unmatched payments are recorded in the Statement of Account extract. If desired, when a student with credit increases their study load, their statement can show both credit still available for refund (if any) and the portion expected to offset the newly assessed debt, irrespective of when statements are produced in the fee processing and interface cycle. Typically, the available credit will have accrued from overpayment in an earlier fee period. | |||
Sponsor credit | |||
Students, not sponsors, are assessed for debt. Therefore credit adjustments cannot be made for sponsors immediately an assessment is reduced. For sponsors, the credit amount is only shown as available (in the Maintain Refunds form, FINF6420) after the new assessment has been processed through the interface to an external financial system. | |||
HECS Payment Options |
|||
A student's HECS payment option for a course attempt is recorded and maintained in ENRF3110. There is also a finance job, FINJ6231, which can change the option automatically. Normally each change in option is recorded as a new record. In this way, a history is built up of the HECS option applying to a student's course attempt during any particular period. However, for fee processing and statistical purposes, the option recorded as current at the census date is the significant option for a fee period. The record for this option may be open-ended. | |||
Using the Option | |||
The following fee processes access and use the student's HECS payment option (and the Differential HECS indicator where relevant) which is current as at the census date :
|
|||
Recording the Census Date | |||
To implement the processing described above:
|
|||
Automatic Option Change for HECS Fees | |||
Running the Process Student HECS Payment Option job, FINJ6231, may change a student's HECS Payment option for a course attempt so that the option recorded at the effective date reflects their actual payment history for the fee period. | |||
FINJ6231 is run with an effective date of 31/3/2000. The student is recorded as Up-front (11), but has made no payment, or insufficient payment, and is therefore switched to Deferred (10). | |||
Government Loan Schemes |
|||
Postgraduate Education Loans Scheme (PELS) |
|||
PELS Overview | |||
The Postgraduate Education Loans Scheme (PELS) is an interest-free loans facility for eligible students who are enrolled in fee-paying, postgraduate non-research courses. It is similar to the deferred payment scheme arrangements available under the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS). PELS enables students to obtain a loan from the Commonwealth Government to pay all or part of their tuition fees. The Commonwealth Government pays the amount of the loan directly to the student's institution and the student repays their loan through the taxation system once their income reaches the minimum threshold for compulsory repayment. |
|||
PELS differs from HECS in that, at the postgraduate level, Government funded higher education institutions offer some courses to students under HECS. Students enrolled in a HECS liable course are required to make a contribution toward the cost of their course and the commonwealth pays the remainder. The commonwealth sets the amount students are required to contribute and most students can choose how they pay that contribution, including deferring the entire amount. | |||
Institutions also offer fee-paying postgraduate course to students. Unlike HECS liable courses, institutions set the tuition fee for these courses and students are required to pay the full amount. For the student, a PELS loan works in the same way as the HECS deferred payment arrangements, however Callista treats the PELS loan using Loan Scheme functionality. | |||
Bridging For Overseas Trained Professionals Loans Scheme (BOTPLS) |
|||
BOTPLS Overview 1 | |||
The Bridging for Overseas Trained Professionals Loan Scheme (BOTPLS) is an interest-free loan facility for overseas trained professionals who are seeking to work in regulated or self-regulated professions in Australia. It is similar to the deferred payment arrangements available under the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS) and the Postgraduate Education Loans Scheme (PELS). | |||
Eligible
overseas-trained professionals who are citizens or permanent residents of
Australia wishing to meet formal recognition requirements for their profession
in Australia will be able to access these loans. |
|||
|
|||
Implementing Government Loan Schemes | |||
Institutions
can receive payment for tuition fees via a Loan Scheme. A Loan Scheme has a Loan Scheme Calendar Instance. This is the logical Finance Customer of the Loan Scheme for all the calendar instances covered by the PELS and BOTPLS government payments. (E.G. PELS could have a PELS-02-1 finance customer for this semester) |
|||
An
institution can receive payment via the following methods: 1. Student payment 2. Sponsor payment 3. Loan Scheme payment 4. HECS |
|||
The first three methods allow the full revenue to be sent to finance via the invoice process and via the Disbursement process. | |||
The
Draw Down process inserts a transaction into the Fee Assessment table
to record the amount of either the PELS or BOTPLS loan. |
|||
Database tables | |||
There are various tables which form part of the PELS and BOTPLS implementation. These tables do not have any forms delivered in this first release and one of the tables needs to be edited manually. | |||
The tables are:
|
|||
This table associates the general loan_scheme with the calendar instance (FINF4500). The loan_scheme_ci_cd will be picked up as the 'customer' for the COFI processing and will appear as a sponsor_cd in the fee_ass table when a payment is made. As part of the implementation whenever a new calendar instance is created, a new record for the loan_scheme_ci_cd table will need to be created. | |||
Processes | |||
Draw-Down Process | |||
Loan Draw-Down Job FINJ6235 - The Draw-Down job is a pivotal part of the Loan Scheme processing. This is similar to the Defer Job for HECS with some major differences. The job inserts an entry into fee_ass for the Loan Scheme selected, for example, a student who has registered as PELS liable, have a HECS payment option of 13. The entry has an s_transaction_type of PELS LOAN and has a transaction category of LOAN. The amount inserted for this transaction is the excess of the assessment over the payments made by the student or the sponsor for the fee. The amount will not include any retention amount for the fee type that is in excess of the student and sponsor payments. | |||
This process does NOT change the HECS payment option for any students. | |||
Payment by the Loan Scheme Finance Customer | |||
This loan transaction amount will be the basis of the invoice for the loan scheme finance customer. Subsequently, a payment from the finance system should allow a payment to be made by the loan scheme finance customer that will flow through to the student's fee assessment fee payment. | |||
COFI Payments job | |||
A COFI payments job must be run to allow the payment made to flow through to the student's record in Fee Assessment area. | |||
Government Loan Scheme Notice of Liability Extract job | |||
Government
Loan Scheme Notice of Liability Extract (FINJ6180).
The extract will write new records for the selected Loan Scheme's Liability
Notice. The job runs at the pre-report stage of its own exception report.
The source of the transactions details section for the extract is the loan
transaction created in the FINJ6235 Job referenced
above. Each Loan Scheme has two views which are created for the Government Loan Scheme Notice of Liability extract. For PELS, they are PELS_LBLTY_EXTRACT_V and PELS_LBLTY_RECORD_V, and for BOTPLS they are BOTPLS_LBLTY_EXTRACT_V and BOTPLS_LBLTY_RECORD_V. These views are very similar to the equivalent HECS views. See ext_pels_liability_notice.htm and ext_botpls_liability_notice.htm for full details of the views. |
|||
COFI customer module and Loan Scheme | |||
The loan scheme calendar instance code is the i_fin_customer for the loan scheme invoices. | |||
A loan scheme customer does not have the following elements in the i_fin_customer record:
|
|||
Expected Payment | |||
The expected payment amount used in the system reports the total of the student, the sponsor and the loan scheme expected payments. | |||
Before the Draw-Down process, the student amount only includes the fees the student has agreed to pay. The only exception to this is where there has been retention for the PELS or BOTPLS related fee type. Both PELS and BOTPLS do not cover retention. | |||
After the Draw-Down process, the student and sponsor expected amounts equal the amount they had paid at the time of the Draw-down process. The only exception to this is where there has been retention for the PELS and BOTPLS related fee type. Both PELS and BOTPLS do not cover retention. | |||
Fee Disbursement - Formula Examples |
|||
ASSESSMENT Formula Type | |||
NOTE: In order to view the tables below correctly, please read this documentation with the screen maximized. | |||
Course specific fees | |||
System fee trigger category = COURSE, UNIT, UNITSET, COMPOSITE |
|||
For any course specific fee, assessment and payment is on a student course attempt basis. Students with a liability for the same fee in more than one course in a fee period (for example, with a liability for a fee type TUITION in two courses in FEE-SEM2) are assessed for each course independently. They therefore have independent records for assessment and payment relating to each course attempt, with disbursement also operating independently on the basis of each attempt. |
Fixed amount disbursements (course fees) | |
Example based on a fixed amount of $10 for each formula | Total amount to be disbursed |
PERCOURSE | $10 * 1 (where the student has at least one unit incurring load) |
PERUNIT | $10 * number of load incurring units studied by student in the course over the fee period. |
CRPOINT |
$10 * total credit point value of load-incurring units studied |
EFTSU | $10 * total EFTSU value of units studied |
* = Multiplied by |
The following table gives suggested combinations of formula components for a course fee. Note that the allocation method STUDENT is not relevant for any course fee because disbursement is based on a liability for a single course attempt. |
Suggested formulas (course fees) | |||
Disbursement Method | Disbursement Fixed or % |
Allocation Method | Notes |
DIRECT - total disbursed amount goes directly to a single specified organisational unit | FIXED | PERCOURSE PERUNIT CRPOINT EFTSU |
See 'Fixed amount disbursements' table above |
% | PERCOURSE | Other allocation methods are redundant because there is only one recipient of the disbursed amount | |
COURSEOWN - total amount goes to the owner(s) of the relevant course | FIXED | PERCOURSE PERUNIT CRPOINT EFTSU |
See 'Fixed amount disbursements' table above |
% | PERCOURSE | Other allocation methods are inefficient because disbursement is to owner(s) of a single course, irrespective of unit teaching responsibility or CRPOINT/EFTSU breakdown | |
UNITTEACH - amount is split across relevant units and goes to departments with teaching responsibility for those units | FIXED | PERCOURSE PERUNIT CRPOINT EFTSU |
See 'Fixed amount disbursements' table above |
% | PERUNIT CRPOINT EFTSU |
PERCOURSE is redundant - it achieves the same result as PERUNIT because the split is always across units |
Example Scenario | ||||
Student | Kim
Lee (student number 9537754) Enrolled in course M300, studying three units: MA001, MA002, MA003 Assessed debt for TUITION fee type for course M300 in fee period FEE-SEM2, 1999 = $150 |
|||
Disbursement situation | There
is only one course owner For each unit, teaching responsibility rests with one department |
|||
Course details | Course M300 is 'owned' by Faculty of Business | |||
Unit details |
Unit Code | Credit Points |
EFTSU |
Teaching Responsibility |
MA001 |
2 |
0.25 | Department of Accounting |
MA002 | 1 | 0.125 | Department of Economics |
MA003 | 1 | 0.125 | Department of Economics |
Disbursement Formula Outcomes | ||||
The outcomes below are based on the above scenario. Read each line as a single formula in isolation. These formulas do not constitute a set, but for percentage disbursement are based in each case on a gross amount - the assessed debt of $150. | ||||
Disbursement of course fees is always based on an assessment or payment for a single student course attempt. |
Formula Each line is a single formula % is based on gross $150 |
Total to be Disbursed ($) |
Allocated Amount |
Recipient | ||
DIRECT | FIXED - $10 | PERCOURSE PERUNIT CRPOINT EFTSU |
10.00 30.00 40.00 5.00 |
10.00 30.00 40.00 5.00 |
Single nominated account |
% - 10% of $150 | PERCOURSE | 15.00 | 15.00 | Single nominated account | |
COURSEOWN | FIXED - $10 | PERCOURSE
PERUNIT CRPOINT EFTSU |
10.00 30.00 40.00 5.00 |
10.00 30.00 40.00 5.00 |
Faculty of Business |
% - 10% of $150 | PERCOURSE | 15.00 | 15.00 |
Faculty of Business |
|
UNITTEACH | FIXED - $10 |
PERCOURSE |
10.00* |
3.33 6.66 |
Dept
of Accounting |
PERUNIT | 30.00 | 10.00 20.00 |
Dept
of Accounting Dept of Economics |
||
CRPOINT | 40.00 | 20.00 20.00 |
Dept
of Accounting Dept of Economics |
||
EFTSU | 5.00 | 2.50 2.50 |
Dept
of Accounting Dept of Economics |
||
% - 10% of $150 | PERUNIT | 15.00 | 5.00 10.00 |
Dept
of Accounting |
|
CRPOINT | 15.00 | 7.50 7.50 |
Dept
of Accounting Dept of Economics |
||
EFTSU | 15.00 | 7.50 7.50 |
Dept
of Accounting Dept of Economics |
||
* Disbursed amounts may not sum exactly to total amount to be disbursed |
Notes | ||||
The table above illustrates suggested formulas for the scenario. Although other combinations of the formula components described (disbursement method, fixed or % disbursement, allocation method) can be used, they are less efficient means of achieving the same results, and may result in slightly different totals because of rounding on allocation amounts at a lower level. | ||||
Generally there will be a mathematical equivalence between credit points and EFTSU, and in this situation the two will be interchangeable for percentage disbursement. However if overrides are used for EFTSU or credit points (see the documentation about enrolling in unit attempts) and do not maintain the concurrence between the two, using EFTSU or CRPOINT in a formula will produce different results. | ||||
Institution-Wide Fees | ||||
System fee trigger category = INSTITUTN |
Fixed Amount Disbursements | |
Example based on a fixed amount of $10 for each formula | Total amount to be disbursed |
STUDENT | $10 * 1 |
PERCOURSE | $10 * number of courses studied by student in the fee period, liable for the fee |
PERUNIT | $10 * number of units with load studied by student over the fee period for all liable courses |
CRPOINT |
$10 * total credit point value of units studied and liable for the fee |
EFTSU | $10 * total EFTSU value of units studied and liable for the fee |
* = Multiplied by | |
NOTE: In all cases, load must be incurred according to charge method apportionment calendars. |
Suggested Formulas (course fees) | |||
Disbursement Method | Disbursement Fixed or % |
Allocation Method | Notes |
DIRECT - total disbursed amount goes directly to a single specified organisational unit | FIXED | STUDENT PERCOURSE PERUNIT CRPOINT EFTSU |
See 'Fixed amount disbursements' table above. |
% | STUDENT | Other allocation methods are redundant because there is only one recipient of the disbursed amount. | |
COURSEOWN - amount is split between courses studied when the institution fee was incurred | FIXED | STUDENT PERCOURSE PERUNIT CRPOINT EFTSU |
See 'Fixed amount disbursements' table above. |
% | PERCOURSE PERUNIT CRPOINT EFTSU |
STUDENT is redundant because the result is the same as for PERCOURSE. | |
UNITTEACH - amount is split across relevant units for courses and goes to departments with teaching responsibility for those units | FIXED | STUDENT PERCOURSE PERUNIT CRPOINT EFTSU |
See 'Fixed amount disbursements' table above. |
% | STUDENT PERCOURSE PERUNIT CRPOINT EFTSU |
STUDENT and PERUNIT are interchangeable - the amount is split equally between all units, irrespective of course. For PERCOURSE, the amount is split equally between courses, and then equally across units within courses. |
Updated 13 February 2003
1 "Bridging For Oversaeas-Trained Professionals Loan
Scheme (BOTPLS)" Information Pamphlet, Commonwealth Department of Education
Science and Training, 2003, http://www.hecs.gov.au/pubs/botpls/default.htm