Future Students Future Students
- Why choose CDU?
- International rankings and reputation
- Study externally
- Study on campus
- Application and entry requirements
- Enrolment information
- Fast-track your studies
- Pathways to Study
- How do I apply for a course?
International CDU International
Why choose CDU?
- Rankings and graduate outcomes
- Locations and facilities
- Student support and services
- Student success stories
For further information please contact the Office of Research and Innovation
- T: (08) 8946 6090
- F: (08) 8946 7066
Business & Government
Business & Government
For further information please contact the Office of Research and Innovation
- T: (08) 8946 6090
- F: (08) 8946 7066
- Community & Alumni
Charles Darwin University places great value on the knowledge, expertise and integrity of its research students and staff and on their commitment to conduct research with high standards of ethics and scholarship. The Charles Darwin University Human Research Ethics Committee (CDU-HREC) oversees all human research conducted under the auspices of Charles Darwin University.
The University’s human research ethics approval procedures are designed to ensure that all students and staff, as well as the institution, are meeting all obligations under the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) and any other relevant legislation or guidelines. Other activities involving people such as evaluation and quality assurance projects may require CDU-HREC approval only under certain circumstances as outlined in the NHMRC’s: Ethical Considerations in Quality Assurance and Evaluation Activities.
All CDU researchers (employees, honorary appointees or visitors) and research students must obtain approval through the CDU HREC for research involving human subjects or their data, once the methodology of the research project, the oversight of its conduct, and the requirements of any third parties are fully understood. The ethics proposal must explain how the research will be conducted ethically and with minimal risks to participants.
The University is committed to minimising risk to participants, researchers, third parties and the institution itself whilst ensuring review processes are efficient, constructive and proportional to the sensitivities and risks associated with individual projects. Human research ethics review processes are undertaken through either the Executive Review pathway or the Committee Review pathway depending on the nature of the project and its intended participants. More information regarding these two pathways can be found below under the submission of new proposals tab.
Some research projects that utilise existing, non-identifiable data and which are of negligible risk may be eligible for exemption as per Chapter 5.1 of the National Statement. A letter of Exemption can also be sought from the CDU-HREC where required.
CDU is committed to recognising approvals by other properly registered ethics committees by means of reciprocal approvals. Projects which already have ethical clearance approval from another HREC but which involve CDU staff or students as investigators must seek Reciprocal Approval from the CDU-HREC. Further information regarding this Executive Review process is available under the FAQ section.
Research that relates to Indigenous peoples of Australia should be informed by Indigenous research ethics principles outlined in AIATSIS guidelines (GERAIS 2012) and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Values and Ethics: Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research, 2003. All Indigenous research requires full HREC review.
Projects that are considered as posing only negligible risk, i.e., no more than an inconvenience, and that does not involve any procedures or participants that require full HREC approval may be eligible for consideration under the Executive Review Pathway. Such proposals can be submitted at any time independent of the advertised submission deadlines, using the same form and process indicated below.
Chapter 5.1.6 of the National Statement specifies that human ethics proposals of greater than negligible risk or that involve research categories requiring full CDU-HREC review. Submission deadlines and meeting dates are listed below under the meeting dates tab. Late submissions will be forwarded to the next scheduled CDU-HREC review.
The same ethics proposal form is used for both the Executive and Committee review pathways.
CDU-HREC Application Form
To submit a proposal for ethical review by the CDU-HREC, download the electronic form below, read all questions carefully and ensure that your answers are concise, explaining your project methods clearly and simply, identifying and addressing any potential ethical issues associated with the project. Submit an electronic version of the form to firstname.lastname@example.org with all required attachments and with all signees copied in. Please do not electronically sign the document, modify the PDF or convert to a word document.
Downloading the form from this site will ensure you have the latest version. Some older computer systems and versions of Adobe Reader program can cause issues with saving, emailing and editing the form. You should test the form on your computer by completing some of the fields before filling out the entire application.
If you have any difficulties with the form please contact the ethics team. For the declarations and authorisation pages, print and scan the two signed pages and attach to the submission email or type the relevant names and copy in signees to the submission email
Required attachments- please submit electronically all required attachments with the submission of the proposal, the CDU-HREC Application Checklist (DOC 40.5KB) can be used to ensure the completeness of your application.
As established in the CDU-HREC Terms of Reference, the CDU-HREC meets a minimum of six times a year to review and discuss proposal submissions. For a submission to be considered at a CDU-HREC meeting it must be received by the ethics office by the corresponding submission date.
Please note that projects posing no more than negligible ethical risk may be eligible for Executive Review. Such applications can be submitted any time outside the CDU-HREC submission dates. For more information about Executive Review and risk assessment please see Submissions of new proposals and the Frequently Asked Questions sections.
|Human Research Ethics Committee Meeting dates 2017|
|Meeting No.||Submission Deadline (by 8:00am)||Meeting Date|
|1/17||23 January||08 February|
|2/17||20 March||05 April|
|3/17||15 May||31 May|
|4/17||10 July||26 July|
|5/17||11 September||27 September|
|6/17||06 November||22 November|
- Dr Bev Turnbull (Chair)
- Professor Lawrence Cram
- Associate Professor James Smith
- Dr Kate Golebiowska
- Dr Shirley Grace
- Dr Yoshi Budd
- Ms Wendy Ludwig
- Ms Shelley Eder
- Mr Peter Combe
- Mr Mike Foley
- Mr Tony Jenner
- Mrs Bronwyn Russell
The National Statement sets out the minimum membership specifications of a HREC and the CDU-HREC Terms of Reference provide further information.
Human Research Ethics Training Workshops
The Office of Research and Innovation provides Research Enhancement Program Workshops throughout the year including human research ethics and integrity workshops.
Free online human ethics training modules designed for researchers and members of human research ethics committees are available at:
There are a number of resources and further information on below, under Essential Reading and also under the Research Integrity and Ethics Resources Page.
Research involving humans conducted by members (students, staff and adjuncts) of Charles Darwin University (CDU) is subject to the National Statement on Ethical Conduct of Research (National Statement). To ensure institutional compliance while facilitating research, CDU has introduced proportionate ethical review, which matches the intensity of ethical review to the risk and sensitivity of the investigation as permitted by the National Statement.
The PDF document below explains how coursework units or courses involving research training at CDU can take advantage of proportionate review through Coursework Program Ethics Approvals (PDF 262KB).
For undergraduate and postgraduate coursework projects that are not covered by a program approval, applications need to go through the relevant Faculty Ethics Committee:
- Engineering, Health, Science and the Environment – Faculty Ethics Committee
- Faculty of Law, Education, Business and Arts - Faculty Ethics Committee
Please check with your Faculty websites for more information about their forms and processes.
A Plain Language Statement (PLS) or information sheet is required for every research project. Most projects also need a Consent Form. These documents are a vital part of your proposal that facilitate ethically sound informed, voluntary consent. Proposals submitted without a PLS or Consent Form where required, will not be accepted for review.
The PLS should be written in terms suitable for the intended audience, should include contact details of the researcher(s), the ethics team as well as any appropriate local, organisational or supervisory contacts. As far as possible, institutional email/phone contacts should be used for any correspondence associated with the project and PLS and consent forms should have appropriate institutional branding. For your convenience, you can use this template to draft your PLS and consent forms. For more information regarding CDU branding of documents please follow the CDU Brand Identity Guidelines.
The sample plain language statements and consent forms provided below are examples only. Your PLS and consent forms will need to be adapted according to the requirements of your individual research project.:
- Example 1: PLS & Consent: Participatory Action Research (pdf 630 KB)
- Example 2: PLS & Consent: Observation/Interviews (pdf 733KB)
- Example 3: PLS & Consent: Anonymous Survey (pdf 580KB)
- Example 4: PLS & Consent: Interviews/Focus Groups (pdf 578KB)
- Example 5: PLS & Consent: Online Survey (pdf 334KB)
The standard wording to be included on the Plain Language Statement after the contact details for the researcher, for contact regarding concerns about the project is as follows:
If you have any questions or concerns that you do not want to direct to the researcher, you are invited to the contact the Ethics team of the Charles Darwin University Human Research Ethics Committee on (08) 89466063, on the toll free number, 1800 466 215 or by email, email@example.com.
The Ethics team can pass on any concerns to appropriate officers within the University.
Department of Education
If part or all of your research will be conducted within the Department of Education (DoE), including within schools, you must seek approval from the DoE.
For more information regarding the research approval process for research or evaluation to be conducted in NT government schools, please go to the DoE website or contact the Research and Evaluation Team at the NT Department of Education.
E: ResearchApps.DET@nt.gov.au / T: (08) 8999 5829
For information regarding children in research you can refer to the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) or the website for the international Ethical Research Involving Children (ERIC) project.
Proposals requiring approval from other institutions should establish which HREC is the most appropriate and seek approval from that HREC first.
To apply for CDU approval for a protocol with prior approval by another NHMRC registered HREC you should complete the relevant parts of the CDU-HREC Application Form (pdf 2.45MB), provide the name of the approving HREC and submit the form along with a full copy of previously approved proposal along with all associated documentation and correspondence and a copy of the approval clearance notice from that HREC.
For projects involving the NT Department of Health or Menzies School of Health Research, see appropriate tab below.
It is the Principal Investigator(P.I.)’s responsibility to ensure that any required permits, visas, student confirmation of candidature, institutional and safety approvals have been obtained prior to the commencement of the research project. Clearance granted by the CDU-HREC constitutes research ethics approval only, in accordance with the National Statement.
Annual Reports are a mandatory requirement of all HREC approved projects, as set out by the NHMRC guidelines. The Principal Investigator is required to submit a satisfactory annual report to the Ethics Office ahead of the anniversary of the approval date. Continuing approval is contingent on submission of a satisfactory annual progress report.
The annual report should give an overview of the work undertaken so far, including any ethical issues that arose, and whether and/or how they have been resolved.
Proposals requiring an extension of ethics approval should submit a renewal request either in the annual report or as a standalone request within sufficient time to obtain renewed clearance prior to the expiry date. Researchers are required to maintain current clearance for their projects until they are completed.
A final report is required on completion of the project or when a project is ceased.
For staff, submission for publication of final results and for students, submission of the thesis, is generally accepted as the point of completion. Renewal of clearance is based on the provision of a satisfactory progress report and confirmation that all ethical issues have been adequately addressed.
Applications for Annual Reports and Final Reports need to be submitted on this form: Final report/renewal (doc 212KB) to firstname.lastname@example.org ahead of the anniversary of the ethics clearance date for the project.
Reports are processed via Executive Review and should be submitted outside of the CDU-HREC Meeting Submission Dates.
There is no pro forma for advising the HREC of variations to projects. Details of variations or modifications from the original approved proposal and the rationale behind the request(s) need to be advised in writing (email is sufficient) to the Ethics team.
The request should include the project number and title the name of the P.I and any student investigators who are part of the project. For changes in regards to project personnel, the names, contact details, qualifications and reasons for joining or leaving must be provided regarding all personnel. It is the responsibility of the P.I to ensure that all members of the team are adequately informed regarding the standard conditions of approval set out in the originally approved proposal.
Where a project involves the NT Department of Health or Menzies School of Health Research staff, facilities and/or data, the applicant should submit their application to the NT Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research HREC for approval in the first instance, go to Menzies ethics.
Where such applications also involve CDU staff, students and/or facilities, the applicant needs apply for CDU reciprocal approval by submiting a copy of the clearance notice (once granted by the NT Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research HREC); a copy of their approved application; and any attachments to the CDU-HREC, as per the reciprocal application process.
It is important to familiarise yourself with the following documents that you will need to refer to when completing your proposal.
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
- NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research - 2007 (revised National Statement, issued 18 April 2007)
- Joint NHMRC/AVCC Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (PDF 830 KB) (issued 29 August 2007)
- NHMRC Values and Ethics: Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research - 2003 (PDF 310KB)
The Commonwealth Privacy Act - 1988
- NHMRC Guidelines Under Section 95 of the Privacy Act 1988
- NHMRC Guidelines Under Section 95A of the Privacy Act 1988
- Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Guidelines for Ethical Research in Indigenous Studies
- The Lowitja Institute - Research Ethics Hub
Charles Darwin University
- The Northern Territory Information Act - 2002
- Charles Darwin University Human Ethics Guidelines (PDF 71KB) (under review)
- CDU HREC Guidelines (pdf 88KB) (under review)
Please contact the Ethics team if you require assistance: email@example.com.
Note: You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view pdf files and forms.
Download Adobe Acrobat reader.
Please note: upgrade to XI if possible.